Malcolm Knowles' "Six Assumptions of Adult
Learning" seeks to establish a framework for adult teaching and learning
that is decidedly different than what has been most commonly used in the West
in the education of students from kindergarten through high school. As Patricia
Williams explains thoroughly in her post, Knowles believed that adults bring a
very different set of characteristics to the classroom in the broad categories
of self-concept, experience, readiness, orientation, motivation, and need to know.
Andragogy vs. Pedagogy
For Knowles, the passive learning pedagogy used on the young in which teachers
acted as a "sage on a stage" with very little regard for the needs
and desires of their students was wholly inadequate if not poisonous for the
adult learning community. Like the Brazilian educator and social
reconstructionist, Paulo Freire, Knowles saw adult learners as having reached a
stage in life where simply “banking knowledge”, as Freire described it, for
withdrawal as intellectual currency on standardized tests was unfulfilling and
even a cause for disdain. Outside of the educational setting, as Williams also
rightly points out, insensitivity to the needs of adults in any other setting
(such as business training) will also result in futility and resentment.
Knowles theory of “andragogy” is posed as an alternative to
pedagogy which is spawn from the behaviorist stream of learning “where the
student takes for granted what is being said to them and they learn it word for
word so they can receive positive feedback from their lecturers (McGrath,
2009). Though some have questioned whether or not Knowles assumptions really
fall into the category of a “theory” and pointed to the lack of empirical
evidence to support his claims, andragogy has resonated with many in adult
education and training because it encourages students to “return to education
and by allowing them to participate they are treating them like equals, and the
student is no longer dependent on them for learning as they would have been
when they were children in the primary and secondary school” (McGrath, 2009).
Credit: thetutorreport.com
Application to General Educational Thought
Though our consideration of Knowles’ work takes place in the
context of a course in adult learning, I contend that what he proposes
represents sound educational philosophy at any level. Even if someone has not
reached the level of taking responsibility for their own learning, experiencing
the enjoyment and satisfaction of new knowledge, and applying it to their own
lives through intellectual or physiological maturity, the approach that Knowles
advocates has the best chance of fostering it. As someone who has spent most of
my life in K-12 education as a teacher and administrator, I see the absolute
necessity of engaging all learners on an appropriate level as seekers of
knowledge that is validated by continual exploration of practical problems in
the classroom and in personal life.
Credit: michaelmccurry.net
The Challenge Ahead
I see the challenge ahead in adult education as being tied
directly to the greater effort in our society to wrench teaching and learning
from the grasp of behaviorism and political/social assimilation. Applying
Knowles’ assumptions means a profound power shift that restores education to
its rightful place as the conduit for personal and social responsibility and
growth. Only then can we hope to tap into the enormous power of the human mind
and those who shape it.
References:
Dewey, J. (1990). The school and society and the child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pg. 75.
McGrath, V. (2009). Revewing the evidence on how adult students learn: An examination of Knowles' model of andragogy. Adult Learner: The Irish Journal of Adult and Community Education. 99-110.
No comments:
Post a Comment